High Court Judgements: PSA v NMC (2019)

Apr 19, 2021

Justice Farbey (09.05.19) in the case of the Professional Standards Authority V’s Nursing and Midwifery Council

  • A panel of the NMC’s Fitness to Practise Committee determined that the second respondent (who is a mental health nurse regulated by the NMC) should be subject to a caution following disciplinary proceedings that arose from her mental health assessment of a person whom I shall call Patient A. Shortly after that assessment, Patient A was found dead.
  • The panel determined that the respondent’s fitness to practise was impaired by reason of misconduct on the grounds that public confidence in the nursing profession would be undermined in the absence of a finding of impairment. It determined that there was no impairment on public protection grounds. Given the limited basis of its impairment finding, the panel imposed a three-year caution order as opposed to a more serious sanction.
  • The registrant accepted all charges and her part in the outcome for the patient.
  • The respondent assessed Patient A with another considerably more experienced nurse whom I shall call Registrant C. Her case too was referred to the NMC. The panel heard both cases together. In relation to Registrant C, the panel concluded that her fitness to practise was impaired by reason of her misconduct and imposed a caution order for a period of three years. The PSA lodged an appeal to this court. Both the NMC and Registrant C conceded the appeal. By a consent order dated 26 September 2018, Registrant C’s caution was quashed and a six-month suspension order was substituted.
  • Currently, the PSA only take cases to the High Court to challenge the decision-making of the NMC when they feel the outcome of the hearing has been too lenient. They do so because they work on behalf of the public who have no mechanism to appeal. If a case is perceived as too excessive, the registrant has to appeal this themselves or with their legal representative if their union is in agreement – this rarely happens.
  • Case remitted to a new FtP panel for review of sanction.
Related posts:
Case study 22 – NMC must reform procedures

This midwife qualified in 2014 and began her career working at a Trust in North-East England working under the preceptorship program. Preceptorship enables newly qualified nurses and midwives to receive ongoing supervision as they enter the working profession to build...

Diary of a Registrant accused

This is a direct account from a member of NMCWatch who has consented for us to publish, but who wishes to remain anonymous. She had 27 charges against her, these were taken down to 10 at hearing and only 1 found proven. The whole process took over 3 years and the...

Letter to investigation of NMC culture & whistleblowing

NMCWatch and Midwives Haven have written a letter to the KC investigating the Nursing and Midwifery Council's (NMC) culture and whistleblowing. To summarise: we raise our concerns regarding the NMC's handling of investigations. We highlight the potential biases and...

The NMC is still failing with FtP.

We ask, does it want to change, or is this lack of insight too ingrained in a process that is no longer fit for purpose?   PSA report is published This week’s annual report out by the Professional Standards Authority highlights that the NMC continues to fail...